After Two Thousand years in the Era of the Covenant of Grace we still find ourselves embroiled in an all out argument of the LAW. Just as in the time of Moses where God gave the Israelites the Law to show them their sin and need for a savior we continue to believe that the only salvation found for men is in the ink that we press to papyrus, paper or tome. What may be changed in God’s Law to rationalize, deconstruct or transform God’s intention in the mirror He provided to Moses?

At each historic juncture when leverage provided flexibility of law, morals and argument men imposed rapid, well constructed updates, negation or transformation of previous law to infuse tolerance and/or controls necessary to achieving greater Dominion. Always the push to inclusive control by powers and principalities and the men who serve them. Even those who call themselves atheist must acknowledge the obvious drive to broader control of humanity. Seeking Global Conquest.

Since the law is their vehicle we must review the history of law and realize that it has always been left undecided, ambiguous or intentionally vague in one area, the Laws that govern the powerful, rich and conquering elements of humanity. Mankind as commoners lack no such ambiguity as apparently those in power or with ambition to become/remain in power must contain something inherent to the masses which threatens their dynamism and quest for Dominion. It is almost as if the power of law is the only method through which they may achieve their prospective greatness.

What then of Spiritual attenuation to legal understanding? What is that relationship of Sovereignty to Law? Is Freedom governed by the law or is the law merely a defining vehicle attempt description of that which lays outside its control? Are men attempting Godhood by their manipulation of the law, proclaiming themselves as Eve and then Adam, equal to or above God? Does the act of putting together words in a new arrangement convey the authority or right of power that those seeking conquest demand? Well, in a review of man’s history we see precisely that.

Men continue to convince themselves that a well written legal document somehow transfers, duplicates or imperially issues God’s Sovereign Authority to the hands of; Premiers, Popes and Presidents when the true cast of Freedom is only found in the Cornerstones of the Rock of Ages. Investigating the word unalienable provides instant dilemma to the would be Emperor all that eyes may gather, for how may any power recognizing the flux of Dominion seemingly pronounce their paper words; Rocks or Sovereign edicts that withstand all impeding forces?

Popes have to call themselves “deity”, bridge between Sovereign Authority or agents/angels of God Almighty to disingenuously wield the image of unalienable anything. It is all a ruse for the Law could never save only define the need for salvation. We are warned that any man or angel proclaiming an alternate Gospel is not of God and ought be accursed. Yet, throughout history we receive and place trust in these waxen examples of men declaring themselves in charge of that which only God may dispense. The Law is their vehicle in this application. That is why throughout history the laws well define the scope of “common Man” but miserably fail in the constraint of elitism.

For God alone is Sovereign and why they must chip away at the law not having arms long enough to contend with the Almighty.