They want the Globe and control of all lands, waters, resources and human assets. Who is to tell them that they cannot have it, especially if our youth have been academically sold on the idea that without one-world structure we are doomed? Who in their right mind would stand against something that is crucial or necessary for all Terrans’ survival? Do we not see the benefits of putting aside nationality and acting as one to construct a Federation of people to rule the globe as one community? Won’t the children now believe that anyone standing in the way of this eventuality should be shamed, defeated and ostracized as a people-hater?

I must admit their logic does make sense with regard to an egalitarian attempt to promote global solidarity and compromise to promote the future of the human race. However these are the same people who wish to use Communism as the tool to arrive at the philanthropic objective. How can killing hundreds of millions of people in planned cull be anything other that genocide? These are the same people that advocate for the wholesale slaughter of the unborn even killing them up to the point of viability outside the womb? How can killing our children ever be looked upon in any other manner than the blood thirsty self-service it has always been? These are the same people who want the elderly properly suicided as they approach the golden years believing them a burden upon humanity and hoping that they will just hurry up and die. How can this be looked at in any other fashion than disobedience and disrespect to God and the loving caring providers who bore and took care of us as we floundered through infancy?

Let us look upon the world with eyes determined on embracing truth. If convincing argument is found for global cooperative then it should not include the surrender of personal property or rights to achieve. Why then do all these plans require a donation of all personal property and civil rights to feed the collective as if someone owning property impedes political interdependence. The grand lies associated with Global Order make a very suspect concept at best for as in all culls, genocide or empiric movements of old it is always the select few, the chosen bloodlines and pedigree that receive the benefit while the others enter determinedly into forfeit of equal rights. We must be honest about the difference in legal requirement based upon family name or banking interest. This is the same old idea of global empire dressed up with egalitarian rhetoric and philanthropic marketing devices but delivering the same eventuality of the poor losing everything and the rich gaining it in return.

This Empire has lived off the wealth of the poor nations for thousands of years and now has found itself prepared to once again proclaim itself public inheritor of all power and authority over mankind. This Roman Empire has as in a down hill rolling snowball collected other duchy along the way effectively become a large sticky frozen clump of power and authority rolling downhill with such force and velocity as to consume everything within its path. They started in Europe and the Indo-European Corridor, fighting back and forth for control of the same lands over which people have contented even before modern Biblical Times. They have changed names so many times that their origins are concealed but when reviewed as we have openly done their ambitions remain the same for thousands of years repetitively. This is the nature of Empire, it must have someone to rule in order to enjoy the benefits of being in charge. It will always seek to subject those vulnerable or innocent to its whimsy and strange desire. Men cannot be free in Empire for there simply is a King over all Kings and then those who serve him with no one the author of their own destiny.

Though there is logic to their intentions the globalists would have us blinded or deceived by their supposed noble objectives. They tell us that Communism is a good way of life yet no nation on Earth that has undertaken its Iron Net has done anything other than suffer. They will say whatever need be said to attain and maintain Power. That is the nature of those who aspire to be Emperor, absolute authority and obedience. The problem for us is that there are thousands of years of history to demonstrate that there has never been a Noble Emperor. Why now all of the sudden would we have arrived at a point where we will see the rise of the first Man who rules absolutely yet does it with prudence, kindness and egalitarian intent. No Emperors are about achieving the objectives for the select few, ingratiating themselves with enormous wealth and then protecting that against all comers by keeping them under the iron fist of power, fascism and military prowess. If we accept One World Empire we will get exactly that, Empire.