Websters.com says that inalienable is not transferable to another or not capable of being taken away or denied.  So, if being born is what assigns me the unalienable right to freedom, then the enemies of that freedom would most certainly align against that moment, that instant where my rights may never be taken away or reassigned.  I reflect on what it means to be born with a right.  Can that be something that man has assigned, given at the moment of removal from the womb, and how does one define that moment that an inalienable right endowed human is assigned that right.  I guess we would have to look to a judge to determine that moment when we are in fact, “born”.  But wait isn’t that placing within purview or jurisdiction that which we had primarily defined as beyond the determination or interference of man?  And if a right is assigned a person, how does that person receive that inalienable presentation?  Oh, now you see my craftiness.

That’s it folks, if you are an American and you believe in inalienable or unalienable rights then you by that assertion believe in God, the assigner of those rights to freedoms we hold dear.  And if God assigns those rights, then he also knew us in the womb, calling us by name before our birth, so how then may we say that the moment of birth is when the rights were assigned?  Is it perhaps a battlefield of prebirth that our children must escape those influences set against their arrival into the dimension?  And since, we have now established that you believe in God, otherwise you cannot possibly believe in the concept of inalienable anything, how then may you possibly be culpable in allowing them to take something that was never yours in its assignment?  If it cannot be removed by man how than am I a man capable of removing my own rights?  For example if I disagree with a judge that I have the right to privacy, does that take away my right to privacy?  And if I say that I have no right to privacy does the court now proceed as if I had no privacy right from the outset.  What if I don’t want to be free?

Okay, you admittedly by placing your faith in the Constitution’s declaration that you have inalienable rights have indicated a belief in God.  We now understand that God knew us in the womb and is the assigner of the inalienable rights.  And additionally, those rights may not be made forfeit by man, which would leave any of those with psychological impairments in dangers detrimental to their own freedoms.  Where does that leave us with regard to abortion?  Cannot be taken, cannot be denied, given by God who knew us at the moment of Conception, not simple removal from the birth canal.  Well, by God it seems that we have an inescapable conclusion of enormous proportions that the “baby” or fetus as they would legally prefer to refer to the soon to be born baby within a woman’s uterus, has inalienable rights and the fact that a judge presumes to be able to determine that they have the capacity to alienate the children from the rights is in itself an abomination of the Constitution’s intent.

God loves you all.  He is no respecter of persons, but the blood of the innocent cries out to him for justice.  In God We Trust, the rest really have little to say in the matter.  In the Great Name of Jesus Christ the King I declare that the unborn should have inalienable rights to freedom assigned them by God who knew them in the womb and no one has the right to transfer or take them away from the child.  In Jesus’ Name.