The sweet news of Christ our Lord

http://youtu.be/auSo1MyWf8g  This type of clip looks so innocent, calling us to worship creation not our creator.  But Christians have insight, and a Bible that warns us to be Bareans about the things we see and hear.  What appears innocent enough is really a platform for the evolutionary religion called “naturalism.”  Below is a Wikipedia dossier segment on the religion of Sir David Attenborough, the man who produced this video clip.  He is not innocent but rather an agent for the prince of the power of the air, seeking to lead astray our youth.  Yes, I too want to hear good news and it bothers me to be wrapped in the chaos which surrounds news in our present era, but I will not choose to bury my head in the sand of false doctrine to soothe my wearied nervous system.  We must look at the motivations of the producer of this good news in order to see their true intention of religious propaganda for the new age religions that began in Babylon with Nimrod.  Give me truth, light, life and the Lord, anything else is deception for my spirit.  Praise Jesus Amen.

Here is another clip that reveals the pressures of spiritualism upon society throughout the ages.  http://www.wnd.com/wnd_video/go-back-in-time-to-see-roots-of-star-worship/#ooid=Z5eHQ2NDquGdsY_jEhnqGlphE5ttq8qY  Before watching this clip please read the below information from Wikipedia on David Attenborough’s religion.

Religion and creationism

In a December 2005 interview with Simon Mayo on BBC Radio Five Live, Attenborough stated that he considers himself an agnostic.[56] When asked whether his observation of the natural world has given him faith in a creator, he generally responds with some version of this story, making reference to the Loa loa parasitic worm:

My response is that when Creationists talk about God creating every individual species as a separate act, they always instance hummingbirds, or orchids, sunflowers and beautiful things. But I tend to think instead of a parasitic worm that is boring through the eye of a boy sitting on the bank of a river in West Africa, [a worm] that’s going to make him blind. And [I ask them], ‘Are you telling me that the God you believe in, who you also say is an all-merciful God, who cares for each one of us individually, are you saying that God created this worm that can live in no other way than in an innocent child’s eyeball? Because that doesn’t seem to me to coincide with a God who’s full of mercy’.[57]

He has explained that he feels the evidence all over the planet clearly shows evolution to be the best way to explain the diversity of life, and that “as far as [he’s] concerned, if there is a supreme being then he chose organic evolution as a way of bringing into existence the natural world.”

In a BBC Four interview with Mark Lawson, Attenborough was asked if he at any time had any religious faith. He replied simply, “No.”[58] He has also said “It never really occurred to me to believe in God”.[59]

In 2002, Attenborough joined an effort by leading clerics and scientists to oppose the inclusion of creationism in the curriculum of UK state-funded independent schools which receive private sponsorship, such as the Emmanuel Schools Foundation.[60] In 2009, Attenborough stated that the Book of Genesis, by saying that the world was there for people to dominate, had taught generations that they can “dominate” the environment, and that this has resulted in the devastation of vast areas of the environment.[61] Attenborough further explained to the science journal Nature, “That’s why Darwinism, and the fact of evolution, is of great importance, because it is that attitude which has led to the devastation of so much, and we are in the situation that we are in.”[62][63]

Also in early 2009, the BBC broadcast an Attenborough one-hour special, Charles Darwin and the Tree of Life. In reference to the programme, Attenborough stated that “People write to me that evolution is only a theory. Well, it is not a theory. Evolution is as solid a historical fact as you could conceive. Evidence from every quarter. What is a theory is whether natural selection is the mechanism and the only mechanism. That is a theory. But the historical reality that dinosaurs led to birds and mammals produced whales, that’s not theory.”[64] He strongly opposes creationism and its offshoot “intelligent design“, saying that a survey that found a quarter of science teachers in state schools believe that creationism should be taught alongside evolution in science lessons was “really terrible”.[64]

In March 2009, Attenborough appeared on Friday Night with Jonathan Ross. Attenborough stated that he felt evolution did not rule out the existence of a God and accepted the title of agnostic saying, “My view is: I don’t know one way or the other but I don’t think that evolution is against a belief in God.”[65]

Attenborough has joined evolutionary biologist Richard Dawkins and other top scientists in signing a campaign statement coordinated by the British Humanist Association (BHA). The statement calls for “creationism to be banned from the school science curriculum and for evolution to be taught more widely in schools.”

Leave a comment